paymentswithpaul_

Visa · Consumer Disputes

Reason code 13.9: Non-Receipt of Cash or Load Transaction Value

The cardholder attempted a cash withdrawal at an ATM or a value load transaction and did not receive the cash or loaded value, in full or in part, despite being debited. This is an ATM and load-device dispute rather than a merchant sales dispute. The typical case is an ATM that debited the account but dispensed nothing or short-dispensed.

Issuer filing window

120 days from the transaction processing date

Merchant response window

typically 20-30 days to respond, depending on the acquirer

Why 13.9 chargebacks happen

How to fight a 13.9 chargeback

How to prevent 13.9 chargebacks

Frequently asked questions

Does 13.9 apply to online purchases?
No. It exists for cash disbursement and value load transactions, essentially ATM withdrawals and prepaid loads where the cardholder was debited without receiving the cash or value. An ecommerce sale disputed for non-delivery comes through as 13.1 instead. If a 13.9 reaches a pure ecommerce MID, it has been misrouted and your acquirer should reject it.
How does an ATM operator fight a claim that the machine did not dispense?
The electronic journal is the core evidence: it records the dispense command, the notes presented, and any retract or error events for the exact transaction. Pair it with the day's cash balancing showing no surplus in the machine, and camera footage if the site has it. A journal showing clean full dispense plus balanced cash defeats nearly any non-receipt claim.
What happens when an ATM short-dispenses a withdrawal?
The cardholder is debited the requested amount but receives less, and the issuer disputes the shortfall under 13.9. The machine's journal and cash count will show the surplus, and the correct outcome is refunding the difference. Deployers who reconcile daily catch these before the dispute arrives and can proactively adjust, which preserves the relationship with the site owner and sponsor.

Related Visa codes